Combines 460 vs 9650 sts

new_kid

Guest
I ran a 9650sts in canola with several other types of machines, it would run 6 to 7 mph in 2200n_acre with 30'windrow doing a excelent job. As far as wheat it had good capacity but I think theres better machines for it. never ran it in oats, we had a 480 cat running in 45bu_acre wheat and it wasn't impesive at all.
 

Coors_light

Guest
The ONlY reason why a Cat wouldn't have been impressive would be due to operator error! The 460, when compared to comparably sized rotary machines, is capable of performing as well as if not better in most conditions. The size of the threshing area far exceeds any comparably sized rotor machine and with the lexions Pre-separation abilities with its preconcave, it has the added beneift of pre-separating the drier crop for more efficient use of the threshing system in tougher conditions. The added ISS (Intensive Separations System),which I wouldn;t own a lexion walker machine without this option, provides the lexion walkers with enough performance to give them a competitive edge with class six and even some class seven rotary machines, especially in tough conditions, which you can't beat for the price of a lexion walker. My neighbor just got a 450 walker and ran a 30' MacDon draper in 50+ bu soybeans and was able to do a very respectable 6mph consistently.
 

dakota

Guest
Capacity is great on the STS, we just never got a decend sample out of it. The 460 should keep up with the STS but it is still a walker machine. We got a real nice sample with our 470s last summer in wheat. For the header, I would never use anything else but a 36' MacDon. The draper always enhances the combine capacity and MacDon has always provided us service second to none.