They wanted to and recognized the need to, however, one has to remember that both the 7010 and 8010 were hastily developed and borne out of their NH counterparts that were nearly ready to release in 2001. This is all info from a friend of mine who happens to work with CNH combine development. When the merger was approved in 1999, CNH took a hard look at what both companies had in the works for new combines, and NH was far closer with a more feasible global design with the CR_CX machines. Case had this far-fetced concept combine code-named the CBX, and they had the AFX rotor on the table to improve the 2388, but nothing close enough to get them a genuine class 7 and quick. Now the NHs were going to be ready by 2001, but of course Case didn't want the NH dealers to have a new combine without a red version, so the 7010 and 8010 project began in about 2000. During testing, the 8010 was the 62" machine based on the CR970 and what was also going to the be CR960. But then NH cost-cut the class 6 and turned the 960 from a 62" machine into a 52" machine like the CR940. Thus, the 7010 also became the smaller 52" wide chassis. No surprise, just as the CR960 has a tough time competing in class 7, the 7010 found itself unable to pull ahead of the 2388 in capacity and performance (many times the 2388 turned in a far better sample at lower losses). Both my friend and I share the same conviction that the returns system is largely to blame, but, apparently someone higher up in Case thinks they know better. So be it; let them keep disppointing customers and beating their heads against the wall. Thus, the 8010 was the only combine that would outpace a 2388 when they finally had to pull the trigger in 2003 with the CR models and the 8010, and the 8010 still suffers from the same hurried development and lack of adequate testing, very reminiscent of the first Gleaner N-series combines, for those of us who remember those days. Nowadays you can't give one of those away. If the 8010 doesn't straighten up, history may just repeat itself.