Actually none. I will take your comment_question as a tongue in cheek honest one, however I feel a bit of biting sarcasm here. Any farmer _ contractor should be proud to have the Hurtts as a dealer no matter if they sold Deere, CNH, or qumquats. This business and life is more than proving ones self worth by the color of car_tractor one drives or for that matter the color of ones skin. We all have our prejudices, that is human nature. However when one tries to propell oneself above another by pulling the other fellow down it akins itself to the drowning man syndrome; climbing on top of the rescuer and thus drowning him drowns the victim as well. That said, the AGCO tractor is built by people who receive a check and benefits written by AGCO, the vendors are paid with a check printed by AGCO, Wall Street sees AGCO, the name plate over the tractor plants say AGCO as well as the name of the individual tractor brands. Agco has partnerships with Gima and Renault. Thus your logic would be that MF tractors are Gimas or whatever. AGCO _ MF do only differ in engines mainly, however the engine_hp is usually the n2 reason folks choose tractors behind service. (SITSMICWACFSAMB, service is the single most important consideration when a competant farmer selects a machinery brand) . New AGCO models will also be introduced this summer that will be unique to AGCO. New parnerships in production will more likely be forthcoming as well. Finally, while I don't know specific $ amount or numbers through Hurtt, the retail dollars would be measured by million with an 's' on the end I would figure. Great market share and volume by ANYONES standard. While naysayers love to beat up on AGCO the fact remains that their marketshare slowly, steadly increases.