Mike
Guest
We had always run Gleaners and a "token" Deere (to satisfy my college buddy dealer) until our local "worlds largest gleaner dealer" went broke last year. Several years with a couple R62's and a 1994 9500 for beans only. We really looked everything over R72, 2388, 465Cat and a 9650. Deere brought us the 9650 and said "run it until you want to buy it or bring it back" We put about 40 seperator hours on it. love the deere platform 930F. Runs circles around our 525 Agco. Corner posts in cab need to be moved to give driver clear view. Other than that we really liked it. However we've heard of a lot of problems(as typical in a new release). In all the 9650 was about the same as the R72 in beans, but the 72 was a man among the boy in corn. We ran it 7mph (8row)in 180-200 bushel corn with very little loss. 5-5.5 was tops for the 9650 before it ran out of power. Cat makes a nice combine. They could reduce moving parts by 200%. After having some troubles with the 465 we used for a day, I too would question service. Gobs of fuses and wires scared me to death. I really liked the 2388. We ran it for a day. Seems to be about a simple as the gleaner, but is more comparable to an R62 than a R72. If it had another 60hp and a bigger shoe it would be better. Fieldstar is more easy to use than AFS and the lateral tilt on the Gleaner seemed to work with less effort, though that could be a difference in the set up. We went with the R72. If Case had a bigger machine similar to the 2388 we would have had a tough choice. We still have the 9500 and will continue to run it in beans. Repairs on it are starting to mount on the 9500 so we may look at a used R52 as repairs on the Gleaners seem to be easier and cheaper that the walker model Deeres. Try 'em. The gleaner system is so simple. case is close but not quite as simple. Good luck