Don't ever apologize for your explanations Terry.We need the unbiased expertise from people like you,Don Estes, and Mr.Gorden who have been around and seen more things than most of us.We can learn something,and not have to sift through the usual OEM sales B.S.. I've come to the conclusion that there must be a design flaw at the very front of the cone and it sends bunches of ropey crops through on a regular basis.The difference between the stand. and the spec. rotors is how they deal with the bunches. One of the toothed sep. bars that I took out has only 600 hrs. on it,and the front toth is almost completely gone,hard-surfacing and all.Back tooth is almost new by comparison.Of course,that was with the stand. rotor and reinforces what you had told me about how the stand. whisks stuff through until it hits the straight bar section.Must be a lot of rotor constipation in that area for all the wear.And wear like that from the crop mat has to be consuming a lot of power. Any way,back to the front end,I've been thinking about what you told me about how the Massey under-shot feeding worked so well.I add that idea with how the Marlins impellers work in tough conditions by not hanging down so low behind the feeder chain and grabbing bunches.If I had the Manchester feeder chain throwing the crop in better,and the Marlins letting the crop in better,pretty soon I'll be able to do wheelies with my little old 1440 in green-stem beans.Must be cabin-fever of the brain settling in around here. I am guessing that you have a drier climate than what we enjoy in the muggy mid-west.Heavy dews every morning until 10:30-11,and as soon as the sun starts down around 6,the breeze goes down and the dew comes on again.And all the time those @and$%n-stemmed beans growl through,conventional mach. or rotor.Just letting you know what we enjoy at bean-time.Sorry for rambling.How's the STS rebuilding going,if I may askIJ