Combines MF 9750 Cut Height

I run a 9850 flex that originally had the 1.5 inch qwik cut on it. When it was in need of a complete rebuild, I went to the SCH sysrem. I don't think it cut as close as the qwik cut did. Its a good system, very easy to use and never break anything, but I am going back to the qwik cut with crary hold downs to try and get a cleaner cut. Some have flipped the SCH completely upside down and gained considerably on their cut height, but if you have rocks, I hear it can really scoop them up that way. I never tried that, as I have a lot of stones in my area. I pitched my sickle down and took all the pressure off my float springs (at the expense of the poly underneath) to try to get closer, it helped, but still not to my satisfaction. Just my 2 cents. Good luck.

My 1859 had the Quick Cut II on it ,and it did a nice job. I do feel that the SCH gives a cleaner cut, but the other one did cut closer. But then again it was an 1859 MF. The 9750 is an white head, and the 9850 is suppose to be a gleaner head, so they are 3 different designs. Which kinda makes it hard to compare. thanks Joe