JAG
Guest
last time we had a wet harvest (4 years ago) I ended up hiring 2 CIH (1688 and 2388) to help me get done. The 2388 with dual 20.8-42s did at least 2x the work of either the 1688 or my TR98, each w_ 30.5s, and didn't leave any ruts --compaction, yes, but the other machines left a real mess which kind of pre-empts a no-till program. The 2388 had bin extensions but I doubt he got more than 200 bushels in the bin when operating in the mud. I put Kirchner dual 20.8-42s on my TR98--and we havent had any mud since. I do like the stability the duals give, especially with a 30 platform head. We have some narrowing county roads that make the 180 width slow as I have to run on the ridge of dirt left by the maintainer, and the DOT has been refusing to allow even farm-to-dealer transport on a semi without pulling the outside duals. Aside from that and the initial cost I like my duals. By the way, we havent had 15 of rain total in the last 2 years. I suppose you and I should each be careful what we wish for! I also was intrigued by the track system under the Bi-rotor, but it would be unworkable for me as I plant no-till over terraces, and a rigid track system was scary enough when I demod a Challenger 75. The header would have to be independently mounted and supported if the machine had to operate over any kind of berm. Ive wondered if the new NH-CIH conglomerate would try adapting to combines the tracks off the Quad-track or whatever they call the big CIH 4x4 tractor with tracks replacing each wheel.