Harvester
Guest
One of my customer_neighbors ran one of these rotors from AGCO last year when it was still in the supposed test phase and I helped him remove and install and evaluate it. He had also run Sunnybrook so it was a good comparison, and for our purposes and crops in ND, the AGCO rotor was, with all due respect, hands down better than the Sunnybrook. The smaller diameter of the AGCO rotor eliminated rotor rumbling (also give proper credit to the rotor knives for this, which break up bunches of crop and prevents the rumbling - this is how they can get away with running the bars in 6 rows as opposed to staggered). Those rotor knives are worth their weight in gold for improving performance in soybeans, wheat, edibles, barley, you name it. Secondly, what a huge improvement in corn!! The Sunnybrook had been tried in an attempt to reduce corn cob break-up that the original 8 bar rotor was pretty good at doing. The Sunnybrook didn't prove to be much better, but when he put the AGCO 6 bar in, whole cobs, like magic. The rotor knives did seem to help in the trashy corn to reduce loss, but in good standing corn when there's not problems separating through trash, I think the knives might contribute to some cob damage, what little there was. Don't get me wrong, I've seen the Sunnybrook do wonders in wheat and tough soybeans compared to the old 8 bar rotor, but the new AGCO 6 bar shined equally as well here and did far better in corn to boost capacity and reduce power requirements of the rotor. As far as power impulses, theoretically you are correct in that the Sunnybrook's staggered design would seem to smooth out power requirements. But when that rotor is spinning 400, 600, even 900 rpm, the straight bar design runs quite smooth, especially now with the rotor knives to break up wads. Given the choice, he (and I) will take the new 6 bar rotor. Three cheers to the engineers at AGCO for finally directing some much-needed attention to the heart of our beloved silver combine, and for doing a great job!!