Kenc - I hear what you are saying about the capacity issue. I think AGCO needs to incorporate some, if not all of the mods from Tom, Dan, and the two Hypers, and getting all they can from the current design before thinking about a redesign. But the need for more capacity in the future is inevitable. Gleaner has a 54 ft draper header out west right now. Remember when Bill Gates said 640K of memory is all anyone will EVER needIJ The feeder house issue is another good point - might need a wider one for more material intake. BUT, look at the feeder house width of an R50_52 - they look quite narrow but they can take a lOT up. I am also a big fan of the Deutz engine, but I don't foresee Gleaner going back to them. From what I've heard, Deutz can't (or won't) make engines that comply with the new emmisions laws here in the U.S. They are also getting to be VERY expensive to fix, but there are some aftermarket parts suppliers. I happened to mention my idea of the H.U.D. (heads up disply) to an engineer at a Gleaner open house about five years ago. He said they have toyed with the idea, but the display was too hard to see in certain conditions. I mentioned it again this past summer to another engineer at another open house. He just kind of grinned and said in a couple of years they are comming out with a new cab. He didn't actually say they were using the H.U.D., but I got that impression. He also said something about fiber optics being used for something too. If they DO use a H.U.D., it would probably need to be designed so the display brightness and_or color could be easily changed as conditions change. Should be interesting to see what they come up with! Tom langan