The information can be a bit misleading. For instance. Some farmers recieve from multiple counties so they may not rank high in any one county but collectively they may recieve a lot. I also see several farms split between husband and wife. So one by themselves may not rank high but together it is another story. Another item to consider is whether the farmer share rents or cash rents his ground. Cash renters recieve 100% of the payment on the land where as a share renter would get less. That brings up another interesting fact. EWG says that something like 80% of the payments go to 20% of the farmers. Well, landlords who share rent are going to get half what a tenant recieves in a 1_3-2_3rds rent. Also, a lot of farmers have more than one tenant so that 80% of farmers getting 20% of the payments are a lot of landlords instead of actual farm operations. I know it looks like a lot of money but I don't know many farmers better off now than they were 5 years ago. So, the payments are just keeping us afloat. It would not take much to live without the payments.....about a 50 cent rise in corn and wheat and a dollar rise in beans would pretty much eliminate the need for assistance. That is not asking for much really. Those prices would just be average, at best, over the last 10 years or so.