I guess one main difference is that Case, Agco, and Deere don't make the majority of their money in another industry, specifically construction. If they were to "pull out" they would basically be folding their tents. I doubt Deere could stay in business selling lawn mowers and vintage Chad little action figures. That said, I suppose their isn't much certainty with anybody anymore. I could argue that since Case, Agco and Deere have all been in the ag industry for a very long time, while Cat has been in, then out, then in again and now out again, history points to the ag companies being "here for good" The second point is that none of my argument is speculation. Cat has sold their share of the lexion venture back to Claas. Some of their dealers still carry them, but CAT has also hopped into bed with another combine manufacturer under the Challenger label. This is not speculation. It is fact. They have also sold off the only other ag line they had, the Challenger track machines, to Agco. lock, stock, barrel, and patents. No speculation here. If Claas can develop their market like they have with forage harvesters, stick with them and support them for at least the next five years, and garner a big enough chunk of the combine market (lets say 20% or better) to survive until I'm not farming anymore, then I will consider them "here for good." Now for the speculation: No ag product I can think of has ever survived the type of arrangement that the lexion combine is in right now. When Cat dealers dump the lexion line in favour of the Challenger line of combines, that will start the long downward spiral. I give them two years. Claas will either sell off the Omaha plant or cease combine production and start assembling forage harvesters and hay equipment for North America.