Thanks tbran. The new concept certainly sounds like creating a very interesting and potentially very high capacity machine. But as brassring says there are a lot of us out there that cannot afford and can barely justify a class 7 machine, let alone a class 8,9 and up. This certainly applies to, by north American standards, the very small Australian market. Australia has large areas but low yields over much of it's grain belt. A very tiny area of corn is grown under irrigation. Most grain farms range from about 2000 acres of crop in the higher yielding areas on up to 20 to 30,000 acres in the low yielding areas with a lot around the 5 to 12000 acre crop area. Yields are around the 60 bushell _ acre in the good areas down to about 20 to 30 bushels an acre in the lower yielding regions. Enormous capacity is nice but not always needed by aussie farmers. Speed, ruggedness and big widths are needed. AGCO, like most corporations will probably sell the designs and rights of the small Gleaners to some other small corporate outfit. Ten years later they will wonder where the hell the new competitor came from so fast. Read "Rolf's" true story in a previous post a couple of weeks ago " Rumour mill rumbles on" about a big accountancy firm in Melbourne, Victoria, who sold off their small clients to other companies because there was no profit in them and then, in a few years had to buy a lot of other accountancy firms to try and rebuild their rapidly declining client base. Some of those sold off small clients had become big clients for the other firms. The big accountancy firm never made it. They were taken over and are out of business. A very salutary lesson to big corporations. look after the little guy because one day, just possibly, he and a some of his mates may be a very big guys indeed. Cheers!