tbran
Guest
Turret bearings and premature flight wear compared to the std unloader is a fact of life. Someone builds a shield for the bearings to prevent grain from getting past the brg shields. If they don't post ask again and I can get you the n. Seems to be a local problem. There has been no change in the system except to increase the size of the support bolt and the size of the hex shaft which can be done without too much labor. I would put in the new larger bolt by redrilling the outside and tapping out the inside. Make sure the pivot bolts don't bind the angle drive inner hsg. It is not something that was brought out too early. It is the about 20 year old massey system. The last field day I went to, a customer had a competetor's 'factory man' up against a combine and was eating him alive about the money spent on the unloader system. Anytime you take grain through 2 right angle drives and support that kind of weight the price is paid in durability over the std. system. I would like to see the entire verticle flighting 1_4" like the ends. I would opt for the new increased diameter unloader personally as long as one has an 8 row + head or 25' - 30' grain head. The std or new hy- capy. unloader should not be a problem clearing hoppers as is the problem with windrow machines. Of course conditions vary and with the Gleaner you can choose the option. Isn't that unique.