Combines Turret style unloader

Wow

if ya cant say anything nice dont say anything at all go back to your little green page and squawk to the others about your combines with 60% more moving parts have heard from lots of people that were told by their deere dealer to trade their 1 year old sts off on a IH and bring it back to trade for the new sts otherwise it would cost them $30K to trade so i wouldnt talk about resale too loud

We did run a 9650sts last fall for 3 days. The new platform is great and the hydro-deck plates on the corn head are very nice. My complaints: -moving parts. Not as many as the ten series but more than a Gleaner or CaseIH. -cab posts. They sit right at the end of a 30' heads view. Visibility of the header ends is poor. -screen settings. In dry conditions setting it was easy. In 25% moisture corn we never felt comfortable setting it because the screenings go through the chopper making it hard to detect field losses. -power. The 9650 needs more HP in green stem beans and high yielding corn. We had a 2388 next to it and the Deere did not have very much more capacity as advertised. -poly corn head. The idea is nice but the entry angle is steeper than the Gleaner. We ran a STS_465_2388_R72. We went with the 72 for price and performance reasons.