I agree that the Natural Flow design is superior to an axial. However, width limits the Gleaner to further capacity increases that apparently are being demanded of manufacturers. Yes, the 75 can be tweaked and Hyperized to get some more capacity, but perhaps not enough for the long term capacity increases that will be needed. I'd rather see Gleaner go to an axial design now that can be improved upon and larger models made, than to see AGCO keep trying to squeeze more capacity out of the Natural Flow in the short term, and then have to play catch-up to other brands when the limit is hit and larger machines are needed. We all like to make fun of JD not introducing a rotor for 30 years after everyone else. I'd prefer AGCO didn't take that road. That being said, AGCO already has the expandable axial Massey design under their ownership. So far, they are proving to be reliable, simple, and high capacity. Yes, I'd like to see Gleaner's cleaning system applied to the Massey design - and maybe they are working on that. I don't think AGCO will pull the plug on the NAtural Flow until demand for class 6 and 7 combines winds down. Illinois Gleaner - The way I'm looking at the situation, AGCO might be looking to take my current wife away in the future and provide me with another wife. She may not look the same and might not have some qualities I liked about my former wife, but maybe the new wife has some qualities the old one didn't have. I guess I would be somewhat happy my new wife is the same color as the old one - and not some riff-raff green wife. lOl!! We all have to remember that we've been down this road before. Deutz Allis quit producing conventionals around '87. I'm sure a lot of people were concerned about that - I know we were. But, once we got used to our new wife and how to get her to please us (which, BTW, is the opposite in a lot of ways than our old wives!),we became quit happy and hardly miss the old wives at all anymore!