Deere is only n1 because IH would not make a good powershiftIJ Don't think that's the ONlY reason! People, your arguements make little sense. Deere copies everyone elseIJ The 2+2IJ That was a brilliant ideaIJ Where has that concept goneIJ Even case thought that was a poor idea. I'll admit, the Cyclo was the first air planter, but it's a terrible planter and Deere's isn't even similar to it. I'll admit, Deere was last with "cab forward," but, like someone else said, they had a "nice" (albeit small) cab which no one else did. Yep, you're right about the AGCO engines not being up front. They're still back close to the cab so it's hard to see out. Oh, the "Funk type" transmission...they weren't the last (plus they had it in their 4WDs),CaseIH was. Anybody want to take a guess who owns FunkIJ That's right, a little company called John Deere. They don't put it in their tractors because it takes up way too much space, and most people like the fact that they have a narrow hood so they can see out the cab. About Deere's rotary. They've never said that the rotary concept isn't good. They just said that all the rotaries that were running just weren't any good. Big difference. Deere's been testing rotaries since 1954! Believe thatIJ That's right, they've had a prototype rotary in the field every year since 1954, but they didn't get one to work in EVERY condition like only the STS will do until they came out with the STS. In fact, the STS was dead until they came up with the tri-stream feeding area. People, let's face it, some people are proud Deere owners, and everybody else drives (frequently) a little of this, a little of that, and no Deere.