Gben, that's good news! I really hate to see any more of our custom harvesters go by the wayside over something as mundane as a brand of combine. Bundy, I agree wholly about the current situation with our combines. I stated this to some factory representatives at a major farm show 12 years ago, that our combines were at the peak of their crossroads. This was still before the electric sieves, though I knew it was coming. It simply had to, along with the yield monitors, self-leveling shoe, crop moisture monitors and a host of other gadgetry. In fact, I described such features in a term paper I wrote while still in high school in 1976! Okay, here's the choice to make for our combines: 1. Build them complete with cybernetics, cybertronics, artificial intelligence, artificial vision, GPS, artificial hearing and anything else needed to not only make it a completely robotic system, i.e. driverless, but able to interact with other machines, vehicles, people and even animals, even taking evasive action as needed from something threatening. Okay, I know, it's more like a combine from Star Trek, but seriously, many features once only science fiction, are today's current technology. 2. Make combines just like those of the late 1960's to early 1970's, plain, mechanical, without E_M controls_functions. Hydraulics okay, but nothing like the electromagnetic-controlled ones. Keep the capacity current with the times. In essence, the end would be not a "9500," but instead, just a big, "overgrown 95." Would it sellIJ Well, that's anyone's guess. After all, it would be a huge combine with ample capacity, yet without the bells and whistles we've come to associate with combines. It will definitely be a lower-priced unit. Now, some will argue that choice No.2 will be a marketing failure. Maybe it will, but maybe not. The bottom line is, that Mr. Farmer was at least GIVEN A CHOICE, which is NOT something our combine companies have not been giving us for most of 25 years.