Thanks. As an ag-equipment company historian myself, I did not know this. Everyone thinks that all the merger stuff of the last 20 years is something new. For example, it took MANY companies over the first years of the 1900's to form what we later knew as International Harvester. I'm sure back then, the farmers of those days were sitting around the local grocery (a much lower tech way of what we do here) wondering how the world would survive without Plano Mfg Co or Deering Harvester Co. And all these companies would fall under the umbrella of one large company they would ask one anotherIJIJ Hey, it was about making money then as it is today. The ag equipment business needs to be purged and merged now more than ever. As in the above post, I too hope someone is keeping track of all this, so that in 50 to 100 years when names disappear and new ones appear, we (they) will know the roots of all these great companies that provide the tools for the business of agriculture. With all the goings on of the AGCO_Cat thing, I think only good things will come out of it. There is now more real competition for the big green monster, and I think it will only make the end products to the user better from every company, no matter what the color. Happy New Year